Admissions Essay: To Fly Alone :: Medicine College Admissions Essays

Admissions Essay: To Fly Alone "Dr. Johnson ... Dr. Johnson...." As I wearily walked down the artificially lit corridor, I realized it was my father's doctor being paged. I turned and ran towards the intensive care unit I had left a few minutes ago. The sterilized odor of the hospital overwhelmed me as I raced through a maze of white walls to confront his death. After bolting through heavy metal doors, I saw doctors and nurses rushing frantically around the room. I could only hear one sound. It filled the air and was audible above all the commotion and the heavy pounding of my heart. The monotonous beep of the monitor meant Daddy was gone forever. While sitting next to his cold body, I focused at the crimson drops, which stained the yellow linoleum floor and slowly remembered what a terrible ordeal the past six weeks of hospitalization had been. My Life had changed forever since the day I sped through traffic with my Dad shivering in the back seat next to my worried mother. I was scared to death without even knowing that the killer was Leukemia. Although the chemotherapy proceeded well, it gradually wore my father away. The first side effects were a loss of appetite accompanied by nausea and vomiting. His hair fell out next, and I could tell my Father's courage was beginning to waver. A look of pain and anguish had replaced his usual smile and with each passing day he looked more like my grandfather. It all seemed like a bad dream. While packing up hours after he had passed away, I found a note directed towards me. It was in Father's handwriting; blurry scribbles because the medicine made his hands shake. I sat down and cried because it said in Spanish, "My son, it is time for you to fly alone." It is hard to understand Dad's absence, and that he left on my 17th birthday. Although I miss him everyday I am grateful for all the time we spent together and everything my father taught me. He pointed me in the right direction and made me believe in myself. There is good in this beautiful world, and life will always receive my best effort. I will never be embarrassed by my heritage and will succeed. I know he is proud of me.

Is “Lord of the Flies” a Searching Examination

Wave got to have rules and obey them. After all, were not savages we're English. And the English are best at everything. † These are lines taken trot chapter 2 tot the novel ‘Lord tot the Flies'. To show the change in the character and the situation through the novel here is another quote from the last chapter of the novel, â€Å"l should have thought,† said the officer as he visualized the search before him, â€Å"l should have thought that a pack of British boys- you're all British aren't you? Could have been able to put up a better show than that— mean—â€Å". The novel shows Itself to be a lot of things, a comment on war, an adventure novel or d statement of character. Through the book Gilding attempts to not only warn us about the consequences of another war, but also enables LIST to view an array of different personalities and people profiler Yes, ‘Lord of the Flies' is a searching examination tot human nature, where trot the reader not only gets an authorial opinion on various types of people but also get to, for themselves, form an image of the individualistic of each and every character.The arguable protagonist of the novel is Ralph, a rational and democratic leader who is Mathew obsessed with the fire. In the start of the novel he too is Indifferent towards the easy target Piggy, but slowly learns to respect him. It Is Ralph who Initially keeps the boys focused on their goal of being rescued. But ads his mind gets clouded so does his objective. Gilding shows Ralph to be the closed man, an evolved creature who conforms to society but still has his flaws.Ralph shows his flaws when he continues to disregard Piggy's asthma by saying â€Å"Sucks to your as- marl† whenever the topic is broached. He also shows poor Judgment when he gives into his primitive instincts and participates in the killing of Simon. Ralph to the reader symbolisms the leader who is civilized and dedicated but can often slip-up and make m istakes. His relatable reactions and simple solutions represent a man of will, vivo Is defeated by circumstance. He wants to let the fire continue but has too little manpower to do so, but still persists on finding a solution the next day.We also see him to be delusional at times, like when the curtain flickers In his brain and he Is unable to think HIS biggest moment of what can be called stupidly Is when he says, â€Å"Supposing we go, looking like we used to, washed and hair brushed?- tater all we rent savages really and being rescued isn't a game—â€Å". He believes that despite the savagery that has spread through Jack and this tribe they will listen to him if he takes a shower, it is possibly his biggest moment of failure. Through the same instance we see another trait of human nature in him which Is desperation.Ralph is trying to cling on to any little form of order and hope that he can muster. He hopes to win the other boys over with his endeavourer to appeal to the little remnants of collocation, Another striking event that stands out with respect to Ralph Is when he slaughters the beast†, he Is the one trying to establish decorum and It Is he who destroys the reason tort chaos. To contrasts Ralph as the civilized human being Gilding creates Jack, the adversary. Ironically a choir boy, Jack slowly turns out to be tyrannical dictator and comes to represent the evil or the ruthless side tot human nature.A first, Jack goes along with Ralph and allows himself to be appeased as the head of the hunters. He is content with his position and desperately tries to gather meat. His first attempt at killing the animal is disastrous not due to lack of skill, but because he still as some conscience left in him and is actually scared of committing the murder. He also says that while he hunts he feels like he is â€Å"being hunted†. This shows the last fragments of humanity left in him. He turns into an almost repulsive animal at the end of the n ovel.Gilding shows man's primitive instincts in Jack, his need for food, power and blood. We often wonder from where the deep seethed blackness appears in Jack. I can only speculate that the intensive education provided to him in the church results in a catastrophic rebellion where Jack loses all sense of sanity and informs to the baser human. Towards the end of the novel Jack is adhered to as the chief and everyone on the island fears him. He hates Piggy from the very beginning and is fearful of his intelligence.He knows that Piggy's rationality could be responsible for his downfall and could harm his dictatorship. He is envious of his superiority. â€Å"His tone conveyed a warning, given out of the pride of ownership, and the boys ate faster while there was still time. † Jack establishes his authority through brutality and force. He symbolisms the savage and primitive part of human nature. His interactions with others more or less result in a display of rage and anger and h e pitilessly forces the others to adhere to him. He orders the murder of Simon, the theft of Piggy's glasses and even asks for Rally's life.Gilding, through him examines, in depth the evil within man and the ugly part of the human mind. Another character that Gilding uses to further examine the human race is that of Piggy. Through this â€Å"fat boy' the author shows rationality, reason, science and intelligence. Piggy along with his specs is the symbol of wisdom and provides an outlook into scientific man. Despite his intelligence, Piggy has his short comings; he has asthma and is a social outcast due to his superior intellect. He is fear full of Jack and even says, â€Å"We should fear each other†.His character gives the reader yet another example of a different type of human being, one who is above the rest intellectually but suffers from isolation and anxiety. Through him, Gilding dives deeper into the psyche of a visionary. While Piggy, as a character does lend himself to the examination of human nature, his death too is a fine example of Gildings thesis. When Piggy is killed by the tone which is rolled down we see no humanity left within these boys. We see only Ralph grieving the loss of a great friend, but everybody else especially Jack is oblivious.This shows us the common feeling of new within man. All the boys were louses of Piggy, his glasses and his intelligence. The Conch too shatters with Piggy which further accentuates the dilapidation of civilization on the island, it also highlights man's complete disregard for rules and his natural instinct to rebel. If lack is part of darkest hues in the character palate, and Ralph can be painted in shades of grey, Simon resembles the purity of white. In Simon Gilding explores the spiritual and innately good part of the human heart.Simon thinks only for the good of all, he practices meditation and sacrifices himself in an endeavourer to save everybody. He is close to nature and is the only one who ha s a conversation with the sow. It is Simon, who understands the universal truth that it is not each other that we should fear nor I it some third person, but it is the evil within us that will eventually USA . It is rather entourage at t TN this extraordinary, Christ-like texture is continually marginal's and is at the end murdered unfeelingly. In him Gilding pictures the saint, the pure visionary who knows the truth.His character highlights the differently abele or the higher human nature, one which connects with God and Nature. With respect to Simon it is not only he who is a specimen to investigate human nature for Gilding, but his interactions with the sow's head and his death too focus on some other human traits. For example when he talks to the sow he displays a curtain of bravery which could be taken as the bravery of a martyr or the fade of a coward. His death however, according to me displays the most range of human motions.The act itself shows primitive violence and carnal needs at its very roots. The reaction of the boys to the death is indifferent and they go on like nothing has happened, it shows that the different and often better people are always thrown away. It also shows the human habit of denial, where all the boys including Ralph completely deny any part in the killing. In the book, Simon is shown to be a true unsung martyr. The littlest in the book resemble the common man in society and his reflex reaction to conform, whereas the other biggies resemble the followers and ails of the leaders.A bugging who distinctly stands out is Roger, he acts as second in command to Jack and it is he who is responsible for Piggy's death. All the boys fight for power, they all want to control something. The sow shows the need for security, the Conch the superficial need for rules and the glasses the human need for technology. Through the novel, ‘Lord of the Flies' Gilding not only dives into the human mind, heart and soul by meaner of implication, but provides the reader with concrete examples and instances where the various facets of human nature are displayed.It is ironic that when â€Å"the beast† is killed by Jack the fire begins to destroy, and it is the fire, not one of hope but one of destruction that leads to the rescue of the boys. Through all these examples from the text I can without a doubt say that the novel is truly a fine example of an in-depth analysis of human nature. It makes a powerful impact on the reader and gives them food for thought. It makes us think of not only the various possibilities but also the extent to which the human mind and its essential evil nature can raise a storm and leave a pile of destruction behind.

Nature vs. Nurture in Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

Nature (our genes) and nurture (our environment) affect our individual differences in behavior and personality. In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley addresses the conflict of nature vs. nurture. Victor Frankenstein creates a child whom he abandons upon birth. This brings up questions such as, was the creature genetically inclined to be evil, or did the hostility he encountered turn him evil? Are ones surroundings determined by who they become later in life? Does nurture form ones characteristics that will determine who someone is later in life? Mary Shelley used these questions as an approach to show that the monster is intelligent, but destructive, and had guilt due to his environment and isolation. The monster’s guilt due to its†¦show more content†¦In contrast, the monster expresses that if he had learned to behave and act like The monster acknowledges that his environment directly affected his behavior and personality. Growing and learning around the cottagers caused him to develop into a kind, caring, and helpful being. In contrast, the monster expresses that if he had learned to behave and act around someone such as a soldier, he wouldnt be the same. Upon the disappointed encounter with Felix, Agatha, and Safie, the monster no longer behaves the same. He expresses this when he says, â€Å"There was none among the myriads of men that existed who would pity or assist me; and should I feel kindness towards my enemies? No: from that moment I declared everlasting war against the species, and†¦ sent me forth to this insupportable misery,† (Shelley 124). He is now hateful, rather than the trusting creature he once was. His environment and experiences have led him to alter his personality and perspective to suit the increasingly disappointment nature of his life. In The Quarterly Review(1818), John Croker states that Frankenstein had seen a light which started this madness, and as a result, the creation had to nurture itself. Frankenstein studies life and death in order to figure out how to create one. Once he had seen the light, it encouraged him to take action. (PAGE 215 quote) This quote shows that Frankenstein wentShow MoreRelatedNature Vs. Nurture in Mary Shelley ´s Frankenstein1008 Words   |  4 PagesNature vs. Nurture Francis Galton, the English Victorian polymath first coined the term, Nature vs. Nurture in 1871, when he considered how much influence our upbringing had on our fate, and whether or not our destiny was preset. Long before the term Nature vs. Nurture was coined, Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel, Frankenstein, explored the idea of nature vs. nurture in the context of creation. The greatest exemplification of Nature vs. Nurture in Frankenstein is explored in the fate of the Creature, whoRead MoreNature Vs Nurture : Mary Shelley s Frankenstein2057 Words   |  9 PagesIn Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the theme of nature versus nurture is seen throughout the novel. Freud and many psychologists state that nature and nurture influence development because genes and environment, biological and social factors direct life courses, and their effects intertwine. Through the Creature s continual rejection by society and Victor, Mary Shelley shows that social rejection altars the Creatureâ €™s attitude towards society and pushes him to be vengeful. In Frankenstein the CreatureRead MoreMary Shelley s Frankenstein - Nature Vs Nurture1857 Words   |  8 PagesEasily one of the most notable themes in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the role of nature versus nurture in developing children, recurs throughout the novel with the two main characters, Frankenstein and his creature, believing in opposite sides of this theme. Favoring nature, Frankenstein maintains that the creature was always evil from the moment of creation, regardless of the creature’s experiences. However, the creature, in his narrative to Frankenstein, argues that â€Å"[he] was benevolent and good;Read MoreFrankenstein : Are Monsters Born Or Created?1058 Words   |  5 PagesFrankenstein: Are Monsters Born or Created? Throughout the novel Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley, the creature is subjected to countless acts of violence and rejection. For a monster to develop, one must have been formerly exploited either by an individual or their society. The creature is not only a physical product of science, but his atrocious behavior is also an explicit result of Victor’s actions toward him. The creature was not born a monster, but slowly morphed into one as he experiencesRead MoreTexts in Time Frankenstein and Bladerunner : )1400 Words   |  6 PagesModule A: Texts in Context â€Å"Mary Shelley’s values are still relevant to society today†. Discuss with reference to your knowledge of Blade Runner and Frankenstein. (1200 words) Frankenstein, Mary Shelley’s cautionary tale of science vs. religion was first published in 1818, in an increasingly secular, but still patriarchal British society, amongst the aftermath of the French and Industrial revolutions and a burgeoning scientific research scene. Upon the second release in 1831, the novel was greetedRead MoreEllen Gonzalez Per. 5 Frankenstein Mary Shelley’s â€Å"Frankenstein† is about Victor Frankenstein’s600 Words   |  3 PagesEllen Gonzalez Per. 5 Frankenstein Mary Shelley’s â€Å"Frankenstein† is about Victor Frankenstein’s excessive knowledge in the sciences and his refusal to accept his own creation. Frankenstein starts with a healthy curiosity in the sciences that eventually turns into an unhealthy obsession he can no longer control. He undergoes a drastic transformation because of making experiments that eventually result in his biggest one yet; the monster. Shelley applies the themes: the danger of too much knowledgeRead MoreNature vs Nurture in Frankenstein Essay882 Words   |  4 PagesNature vs. Nurture in Frankenstein In the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the relationship of external appearance and internal feelings are directly related. The creature is created and he is innocent, though he is severely deformed. His nature is to be good and kind, but society only views his external appearance which is deformed. Human nature is to judge by external appearance. He is automatically detested and labeled as a monster because of his external appearance. He finallyRead MoreNature vs. Nurture in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein1247 Words   |  5 Pagesdevelopment, and deeds. As crucial as canvas in art, the philosophy of nature and nurture come together as the fundamental structure to one’s personality and genetic makeup. In the novella, Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, the association of the exterior appearance and inner feelings are openly linked. The hideous creature that the science addict, Victor Frankenstein, makes is initially innocent yet severely deformed. His nature is to be benevol ent and sympathetic, however, society only views his externalRead MoreMary Shelley s Frankenstein, And The Modern Prometheus3901 Words   |  16 Pages â€Å"Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus†, by Mary Wollstonecraft (Godwin) Shelley Mary Shelley s novel Frankenstein is best known for its influence in popular culture through many film adaptations. It is in fact, however, one of the great novels of ideas. Write an essay that discusses in what sense you think it is a novel of ideas. What are its claims about human reason and human nature? Shelley explores some aspects of human nature, specifically human lust for power and the unfortunate way weRead MoreFrankenstein, By Mary Shelley962 Words   |  4 PagesFrankenstein, by Mary Shelley, is a tale of a scientist that would go to any extreme to get what he desires- knowledge. Prior to reading, it was assumed that the creature created by Victor Frankenstein is the real monster of the story- the vicious, ugly, and senseless being. Based on the creatures actions in the book, it can be inferred that the creature is a monster, but only on the outer surface. He shows compassion towards humans at first and thirst for knowledge and acceptance. This tenderness